Emerging Voices

Penetration Testing vs. Red Teaming

By

Pete Desfigies, Contributing Writer and Efthimio Sakkas, Threat Intelligence Analyst

By

Access Point Consulting

Introduction

The IT industry is kept on its toes by a spectrum of hackers—from those with malicious intent to those who use their skills for help others. Hacking itself ranges from constructive activities to destructive exploits. Ethical hacking has become an essential response to this state of security, and within this domain, two prominent methodologies are noteworthy: penetration testing (pen-testing) and red teaming. Depending on your organization’s specific security needs and resources, you may be interested in employing one or both of these approaches. This article provides an overview of both to help you make an informed decision.

Penetration Testing

Penetration testing (pen testing) is a proactive cybersecurity measure designed to identify, assess, and address vulnerabilities within an organization’s systems, applications, or network infrastructure. The primary benefits of penetration testing include the early detection of vulnerabilities, enabling organizations to address security gaps before they can be exploited by malicious actors. Additionally, pen testing provides informed security prioritization, allowing businesses to focus resources on the most critical threats to their infrastructure. It also validates existing security controls, ensuring that the measures in place are functioning as intended and providing robust defense against potential cyberattacks. These benefits collectively enhance an organization’s ability to maintain a strong and resilient cybersecurity posture.

Pen testing can be conducted manually or through automated tools, which guide exploitation attempts and generate detailed reports. Whether performed internally or through external providers, pen testing is a critical method for strengthening cybersecurity defenses and safeguarding sensitive data. By not only identifying vulnerabilities but also assessing their potential impact, pen testing helps organizations mitigate risks and enhance their overall security posture.

Red Teaming

Red teaming involves a specialized team, either internal or external, that conducts covert audits of an organization by simulating cyberattacks. The red team assumes the role of a threat actor attempting to infiltrate the organization. This exercise allows the organization to assess how effectively their IT security team (often referred to as the “blue team”) detects and responds to the simulated attack. Red teams and blue teams operate as distinct entities, each countering the objectives of the other. Alternatively, a single team can perform both roles, a practice known as purple teaming. Purple teaming often involves more collaboration and knowledge transfer during the engagement.

The main purpose of red teaming is to allow an organization to experience a controlled, real-world attack scenario, typically without a time limit, to observe how it can react. This approach keeps employees vigilant for unknown risks and helps identify areas where the organization should invest in training, tools, and overall security enhancements. Ultimately, red teaming is designed to boost the effectiveness of an organization’s security teams as a whole.

Conclusion

Although both penetration testing and red teaming involve ethical hacking, they represent distinct approaches to achieving different goals. The choice between a penetration testing approach and a red team engagement depends on the specific objectives your organization seeks to accomplish. If your goal is to assess system configurations, identify vulnerabilities, and address security gaps, penetration testing is the recommended approach. Conversely, if you wish to evaluate your security analysts' capabilities and test the effectiveness of your security tools in responding to incidents, red teaming is the more suitable option. Ultimately, the decision should align with your organization’s specific needs and security objectives.

References

What is Penetration Testing? | IBM

Penetration Testing vs Red Teaming: What's the Difference? (threatintelligence.com)

Red Teaming and Penetration Testing - What’s the difference? (pwc.com)

The Difference Between Red, Blue, and Purple Teams (danielmiessler.com)

Red Teaming (ibm.com)

Resources

Trending Articles & Security Reports

Resources

CyberWatch

November 22, 2024

Patch Updates, New Malware Threats, and the Ongoing Supply Chain Battle

On this episode of the CyberWatch podcast, there are updates to software across the application and OS spectrum. New malicious campaigns are threatening victims of all sizes, and researchers have performed dissections on malware to give defenders new clues about just what it is they're fighting. All this today, in CyberWatch.

Find out more
October 25, 2024

Ransomware, Supply Chain Attacks, and Nation-State Threats

CyberWatch, by Access Point Consulting, is your weekly source for emerging cybersecurity news, regulatory updates, and threat intelligence. Backed by experts in security consulting, regulatory compliance, and security operations, Access Point enables you to manage cyber risks, respond to incidents, and drive innovation in your company. Read here or on our website; listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts; or watch on YouTube.website; listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts; or watch on YouTube. .

Find out more
October 7, 2024

VINs and Losses: How Hackers Take Kias for a Ride

In the age of smart cars and connected devices, convenience often comes with hidden risks. A recently discovered critical vulnerability in Kia vehicles serves as a stark reminder of how our increasingly digital world is making cars new targets for cyberattacks. This vulnerability allowed hackers to remotely control various vehicle functions—using nothing more than a car's license plate number. It highlights the growing threat of cyberattacks on connected cars and the importance of cybersecurity in the automotive industry.

Find out more